Certainly, though, Warne's and the woman's eyes are locked on each other. Little about this photograph seems certain. Taken on Australia's 1997 tour through South Africa, there's a lovely old cricket ground feel to it. We voyeurs are like desert interlopers pulling back the curtain on a forgotten clan's sacred mating ceremony, and fumble and sweat as we might to draw the curtain shut, it won't go, just jangles and bounces in the railing - I found the photo, no photo credit attached, in a newspaper, not the sport section, next to an article that wasn't about Shane WarneвЂ¦ Naturally I ripped it out and stuffed it in a filing cabinet. Two 'S's - which may be meaningful, or not.

He was also Warne's co-accused during the 'John the Bookie' affair, when phone conversations with John from Delhi about the state of the pitch and local weather conditions proved so inadvertently lucrative that John could not be hanged up on. There's this, too: the Waugh, Mark, who's being doppelganged in the photo was not merely Warne's team-mate.

And his non-identical twin Steve would have been out on the field as well. A doppelgГ¤nger, then? Or twin? The real Waugh, many people reading will know, actually is a twin. Waugh, Warne's team-mate, would have been out on the field. Here's a complication upon a complication: the fourth person, this grinner, is a dead ringer for Mark Waugh. In nearly every Warne photo, barring injury photos and disgrace-laden press conference photos, Warne holds the power, and in this photo, which is the exception, power is with any one of three, or possibly it's two of three, people.ДЄnd, out of nowhere, a fourth person, the grinner - but of course he came sliding into eyeshot from the beginning, only for us to push the idea of him away, one complication too many. We do not concretely know that the guy is her boyfriend. Presumably she had been, and took them off, and if so she planned this, whatever this is, either with the boyfriend's approval, or without. Except - she appears to be wearing no knickers. And the boyfriendвЂ¦ but we don't at all know who here's good, who's bad, if he is pimping her out to the greatest spin bowler the world has seen, or whether the hitching of her dress is her decision, spur of the moment. She is, was, wearing a pear-coloured dress and the pear resemblances keep going from there. Nor is it clear who he has received or is returning the pen from or to: that crooked index finger could be the woman's, or the boyfriend's. But the guy's face is hidden: her boyfriend? A pen dangles between Warne's fingertips and thumb: is he signing for the boyfriend, who's clutching a black folder of some description, or is he autographing her arse? Either Warne has just accepted the pen, or is about to give it back. Except 'aftermath', the way we usually think of it, is not the aftermath we're slap-eyed privy to in the photo above - legspin bowler floats, drifts, spinsвЂ¦ nearby women start hoisting and yanking off their clothes. It can freeze the static-looking ball in flight. But were a legspin bowler to float a ball up in line with middle stump, drift it a few feet one way with the wind, spin it equidistance the opposite direction until it clips the off bail - well, a photograph cannot handle that. If we want to find the row number for a particular value in a specific column then we can extract the whole row which seems to be a better way and it can be done by using single square brackets to take the subset of the row. It is easy to find the values based on row numbers but finding the row numbers based on a value is different. A row of an R data frame can have multiple ways in columns and these values can be numerical, logical, string etc.

Amped five frame average